Ratings for LendingClub Loans
- Update: I stopped updating this page as I'm too lazy to adapt
my scripts to a data-format change. I probably won't update this page.
You can read some detail of my analysis in my blog-post (linked below).
- The following tables list my ratings for loans (or notes) available
through LendingClub. I think (but I could be wrong) that my rating model
outperforms the model currently in use at LendingClub.
- Note: The following is only my opinion on the loans available.
I'm not a professional investment adviser. I'm not licensed as an investment
adviser also. Nothing on this page constitutes advice.
The loan listing and the ratings are provided without any warranty, expressed or
implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and
almost certainly contain errors or omissions.
NO MATERIAL HERE CONSTITUTES "INVESTMENT ADVICE" NOR IS IT A RECOMMENDATION
TO BUY OR SELL ANY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
STOCKS, OPTIONS, BONDS, FUTURES OR LOANS OF ANY KIND.
I may or may not have a position in any company, loan or security mentioned here.
Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or
advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility.
In short: Don't complain if you are loosing money on an investment.
- LendingClub has not reviewed
any of this and does not endorse anything on this site.
LendingClub is not affiliated with this me or this website.
- The model makes a few assumptions, which may or may not be true in
reality.
The outcome ("failure") was defined as default or any
kind of late payment (from the status in the historical data). Note that
the textual features I've extracted were not used in this model as I haven't
figured out a good way to use them for reliably yet.
See my blog entry for more details.
- How it works and how it may help you:
- Ratings are given from 1 to 20 with 20 being the highest rating.
For convenience and as the interest
rates depend on the original credit rating I've appended the original
rating to it. The highest rated loan would be Rating.20.A1.
- Not all loans have been rated. Loans that are suspicious in some way
are not given a rating ("Unrated").
- Click on the links to go the loan on the Lending Club website for the
paticular loan.
- You can sort the tables by clicking on the column header. However,
sorting a large table with Javascript is kinda slow in most browsers.
- The "Exp.Gain" column is the interest rate minus the failure probability
and possibly a good criterion to estimate the quality of a loan.
The "Exp.Gain.Reg" column is experimental.
The "OtherFilter" column may contain a few additional flags for a loan.
The S, H, M, and 1 flag indicate that a loan fits the investment
strategy of another blogger I am evaluating. The "!" flag means that the
loan is potentially risky and extra care should be taken.
Other flags may be added.
- A
discussion on risks for p2p lending you should consider in investment
decisions.
- The loan listings are updated whenever I feel like it.
You can see at the bottom of the table
the date of the last update and a couple of interesting statistics.
Some other folks also built models to predict loan performance, but now both
services are no longer working. Similar listings used to be at:
The ratings are published with a delay. See the "last updated" at
the bottom for when the ratings were updated.
RSS feed for updates on the ratings:
|
MarkusScore |
Prob1 |
Prob2 |
Exp Gain |
Exp Gain Reg |
OtherFilter |
Loan ID |
1
|
Rating.20.A3
|
0.082
|
0.019
|
-0.083
|
1.01
|
|
7455544
|
2
|
Rating.19.A1
|
0.049
|
0.047
|
-4.685
|
1.01
|
|
7381672
|
3
|
Rating.18.A5
|
0.096
|
0.058
|
-2.725
|
0.90
|
|
7341852
|
4
|
Rating.18.B2
|
0.123
|
0.058
|
-1.856
|
0.94
|
|
7449938
|
5
|
Rating.17.B3
|
0.138
|
0.067
|
-1.625
|
0.92
|
!
|
7371642
|
6
|
Rating.17.A3
|
0.082
|
0.067
|
-6.510
|
0.91
|
|
7449695
|
7
|
Rating.17.B1
|
0.114
|
0.067
|
-4.570
|
0.85
|
|
7341897
|
8
|
Rating.16.A3
|
0.082
|
0.096
|
-7.226
|
0.83
|
|
7455782
|
9
|
Rating.16.A3
|
0.082
|
0.096
|
-7.413
|
0.90
|
|
7338346
|
10
|
Rating.16.B2
|
0.123
|
0.096
|
-4.240
|
0.92
|
|
7389806
|
11
|
Rating.16.A4
|
0.098
|
0.096
|
-7.589
|
0.85
|
|
7380556
|
12
|
Rating.15.A4
|
0.098
|
0.081
|
-8.615
|
0.86
|
|
7449530
|
13
|
Rating.13.A1
|
0.049
|
0.117
|
-13.561
|
0.83
|
|
7338143
|
14
|
Rating.13.A5
|
0.096
|
0.117
|
-10.931
|
0.85
|
|
6568049
|
15
|
Rating.13.A2
|
0.063
|
0.117
|
-13.295
|
0.80
|
|
7440034
|
16
|
Rating.13.B1
|
0.114
|
0.117
|
-10.338
|
0.85
|
|
7381906
|
17
|
Rating.12.A4
|
0.098
|
0.113
|
-12.187
|
0.78
|
|
7276604
|
18
|
Rating.12.B3
|
0.138
|
0.113
|
-9.280
|
0.90
|
|
7450070
|
19
|
Rating.12.B1
|
0.114
|
0.113
|
-12.054
|
0.80
|
|
7371829
|
20
|
Rating.11.B1
|
0.114
|
0.120
|
-12.549
|
0.81
|
|
7381880
|
21
|
Rating.11.B3
|
0.138
|
0.120
|
-10.564
|
0.85
|
!
|
7371455
|
22
|
Rating.11.B1
|
0.114
|
0.120
|
-12.601
|
0.83
|
|
7341753
|
23
|
Rating.11.B5
|
0.153
|
0.120
|
-9.015
|
0.83
|
!
|
7371861
|
24
|
Rating.11.A2
|
0.063
|
0.120
|
-16.617
|
0.77
|
|
7439946
|
25
|
Rating.10.B1
|
0.114
|
0.112
|
-14.177
|
0.86
|
!
|
7381957
|
26
|
Rating.10.B2
|
0.123
|
0.112
|
-13.237
|
0.86
|
|
7455786
|
27
|
Rating.09.B3
|
0.138
|
0.145
|
-13.576
|
0.87
|
|
7371830
|
28
|
Rating.08.A3
|
0.082
|
0.173
|
-19.798
|
0.80
|
|
7381682
|
29
|
Rating.07.B1
|
0.114
|
0.175
|
-18.822
|
0.78
|
!
|
7380333
|
30
|
Rating.07.B1
|
0.114
|
0.175
|
-19.749
|
0.72
|
!
|
7381891
|
31
|
Rating.06.B3
|
0.138
|
0.191
|
-20.747
|
0.76
|
!
|
7371744
|
32
|
Rating.05.B4
|
0.131
|
0.205
|
-20.232
|
0.79
|
|
7072081
|
33
|
Rating.05.B3
|
0.138
|
0.205
|
-21.573
|
0.76
|
|
7370476
|
34
|
Rating.05.A2
|
0.063
|
0.205
|
-26.640
|
0.79
|
!
|
7439907
|
35
|
Rating.04.B3
|
0.138
|
0.234
|
-25.040
|
0.78
|
!
|
7380005
|
36
|
Rating.03.B3
|
0.138
|
0.254
|
-29.863
|
0.74
|
|
7342077
|
37
|
Unrated
|
0.049
|
0.019
|
-3.150
|
0.99
|
|
7382117
|
38
|
Unrated
|
0.096
|
0.112
|
-14.842
|
0.82
|
|
7371839
|
|
Loan ratings last updated: Sun Oct 06 11:44:26 AM 2013
All measurements in AUC metric.
Overfit-AUC
0.686
Mean 10-fold X-Validation
0.681
Conservate train/test split by time estimate
0.642
Conservate train/test split by time estimate (LC credit score for comparison)
0.618
Conservate train/test split by time estimate (FICO credit score for comparison)
0.639
LC credit score overfitted for comparison
0.621
Estimated probabilities of "failure" (treating historic late payments as failures):
|
Prob |
Rating |
1
|
0.391
|
Rating.01
|
2
|
0.260
|
Rating.02
|
3
|
0.254
|
Rating.03
|
4
|
0.234
|
Rating.04
|
5
|
0.205
|
Rating.05
|
6
|
0.191
|
Rating.06
|
7
|
0.175
|
Rating.07
|
8
|
0.173
|
Rating.08
|
9
|
0.145
|
Rating.09
|
10
|
0.112
|
Rating.10
|
11
|
0.120
|
Rating.11
|
12
|
0.113
|
Rating.12
|
13
|
0.117
|
Rating.13
|
14
|
0.101
|
Rating.14
|
15
|
0.081
|
Rating.15
|
16
|
0.096
|
Rating.16
|
17
|
0.067
|
Rating.17
|
18
|
0.058
|
Rating.18
|
19
|
0.047
|
Rating.19
|
20
|
0.019
|
Rating.20
|
|
|
Prob |
Rating |
1
|
0.049
|
A1
|
2
|
0.063
|
A2
|
3
|
0.082
|
A3
|
4
|
0.098
|
A4
|
5
|
0.096
|
A5
|
6
|
0.114
|
B1
|
7
|
0.123
|
B2
|
8
|
0.138
|
B3
|
9
|
0.131
|
B4
|
10
|
0.153
|
B5
|
11
|
0.170
|
C1
|
12
|
0.171
|
C2
|
13
|
0.189
|
C3
|
14
|
0.175
|
C4
|
15
|
0.202
|
C5
|
16
|
0.227
|
D1
|
17
|
0.207
|
D2
|
18
|
0.225
|
D3
|
19
|
0.241
|
D4
|
20
|
0.211
|
D5
|
21
|
0.248
|
E1
|
22
|
0.198
|
E2
|
23
|
0.135
|
E3
|
24
|
0.282
|
E4
|
25
|
0.297
|
E5
|
26
|
0.260
|
F1
|
27
|
0.267
|
F2
|
28
|
0.294
|
F3
|
29
|
0.161
|
F4
|
30
|
0.400
|
F5
|
31
|
0.176
|
G1
|
32
|
0.308
|
G2
|
33
|
0.800
|
G3
|
34
|
0.375
|
G4
|
35
|
0.545
|
G5
|
|
[Top]
**The End**
My Homepage
My blog-entry explaining some more about the model
Email me with your comments.